| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2019-01-04 12:19:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAsA6i+sJyx7d5G7tR_wYACXMMF6GuOuDbFQPiBZBuicQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> About syntax: i vote for current syntax "reindex table CONCURRENTLY
> tablename". This looks consistent with existed CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
> and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY.
>
+1
Pavel
> regards, Sergei
>
> [1]:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqT%2B6igqbUb59y04NEgHoBeUGYteuUr89AKnLTFNdB8Hyw%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-04 12:19:25 | Re: don't create storage when unnecessary |
| Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2019-01-04 12:18:06 | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |