Re: don't create storage when unnecessary

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: don't create storage when unnecessary
Date: 2019-01-04 12:19:25
Message-ID: 201901041219.7o2pndpaqzkh@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jan-04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 18/12/2018 08:18, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Sorry to be saying it late, but I have to agree with Horiguchi-san here
> > that RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE sounds better and is clear.
>
> I think I agree. Does someone want to send a patch?

I'll do it.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-04 12:20:09 Re: Log a sample of transactions
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-01-04 12:19:12 Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0