From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed |
Date: | 2017-09-21 08:27:32 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAiVcQzj+LFTuDV=PsM+r09imsH8zHveKAu4StE=mo5UQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-09-21 10:19 GMT+02:00 Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
> peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/8/17 00:13, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > I am sending rebased patch
>> >
>> > rebased again + fix obsolete help
>>
>> Why are the variables called VERBOSE_SORT_* ? What is verbose about them?
>
>
> I assume Pavel called them so, because they are working only for "verbose"
> mode of command. I.e. they are working for \dt+ not \dt.
> However, in \dt 2 of 3 sorting modes might work: schema_name and
> name_schema. Thus, I think it worths enabling these variables for "non
> verbose" mode of commands too.
>
yes. It was designed for + commands only. Can be enhanced to all commands -
then VERBOSE prefix should be removed - not sure if it is necessary. For me
interesting different order than default is only in verbose mode.
> ------
> Alexander Korotkov
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> The Russian Postgres Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-09-21 08:27:47 | Re: compress method for spgist - 2 |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-09-21 08:23:45 | Re: pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization |