From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO |
Date: | 2011-10-15 16:45:45 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRALU0VkxWyj2jaAeKjy6zjUVW_z9217mkcaFcSBhVM1fQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/10/15 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2011/10/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I have no problem with this. A context can be false for info and true
>>>> for other in default. Please, use a different identifier than
>>>> "context", that can be use for reading context in future - maybe
>>>> "attach_context" or some similar.
>
>>> error_context?
>
>> what about show_context, hide_context, hold_context, use_context ??
>
> I still think it should be CONTEXT, period. All the other options to
> RAISE are named directly after the message lines they control; why
> should this one be different?
I had a idea to set CONTEXT from RAISE statement - for forwarding data
from handled exception
some like
BEGIN
...
EXCEPTION WHEN ...
GET DIAGNOSTICS _context = PG_EXCEPTION_CONTEXT;
REISE USING context = _context;
END;
Regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-15 18:58:45 | Pushing ScalarArrayOpExpr support into the btree index AM |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-15 16:02:54 | Re: .psqlrc version dependence (was Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH) |