Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 5:46 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:47 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 12:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > One idea to keep things simple for the first version is that we allow
> > > users to specify the table_name for storing conflicts but the table
> > > should be created internally and if the same name table already
> > > exists, we can give an ERROR. Then we can later extend the
> > > functionality to even allow storing conflicts in pre-created tables
> > > with more checks about its schema.
> >
> > That's fair too. I am wondering what namespace we should create this
> > user table in. If we are creating internally, I assume the user should
> > provide a schema qualified name right?
> >
>
> Yeah, but if not provided then we should create it based on
> search_path similar to what we do when user created the table from
> psql.

Yeah that makes sense.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google