Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:47 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 12:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > One idea to keep things simple for the first version is that we allow
> > users to specify the table_name for storing conflicts but the table
> > should be created internally and if the same name table already
> > exists, we can give an ERROR. Then we can later extend the
> > functionality to even allow storing conflicts in pre-created tables
> > with more checks about its schema.
>
> That's fair too. I am wondering what namespace we should create this
> user table in. If we are creating internally, I assume the user should
> provide a schema qualified name right?
>

Yeah, but if not provided then we should create it based on
search_path similar to what we do when user created the table from
psql.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.