Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2025-12-15 11:41:06
Message-ID: CAFiTN-vYL7SrCrHggHOB7qtNJwfGa43aTqY8u_-RDov1vXsS3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 2:55 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > 3)
> > postgres=# alter subscription sub1 set (conflict_log_table=NULL);
> > ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
> > postgres=# alter subscription sub2 set (conflict_log_table=create);
> > ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
> > postgres=# \d
> > List of relations
> > Schema | Name | Type | Owner
> > --------+---------+-------+--------
> > public | create | table | shveta
> > public | null | table | shveta
> >
> >
> > It takes reserved keywords and creates tables with those names. It
> > should be restricted.
>
> I somehow assume table creation will be restricted with these names,
> but since we switch from SPI to internal interface its not true
> anymore, need to see how we can handle this.

While thinking more on this, I was seeing other places where we use
'heap_create_with_catalog()' so I noticed that we always use the
internally generated name, so wouldn't it be nice to make the conflict
log table as bool and use internally generated name something like
conflict_log_table_$subid$ and we will always create that in current
active searchpath? Thought?

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2025-12-15 11:49:00 Re: alter check constraint enforceability
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2025-12-15 11:32:18 Re: Proposal to allow setting cursor options on Portals