Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)percona(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ilya Anfimov <ilan(at)tzirechnoy(dot)com>
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
Date: 2022-11-03 08:20:11
Message-ID: CAFiTN-uudj2PY8GsUzFtLYFpBoq_rKegW3On_8ZHdxB1mVv3-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 1:46 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>
>> This entry was marked "Ready for committer" in the CommitFest app but cfbot
>> reports the patch no longer applies.
>
> Thanks for the reminder. I think, this should work.

Have we measured the WAL overhead because of this patch set? maybe
these particular patches will not impact but IIUC this is ground work
for making xid 64 bit. So each XLOG record size will increase at
least by 4 bytes because the XLogRecord contains the xid.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-03 08:38:09 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-03 08:16:21 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum