From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data |
Date: | 2021-05-26 06:25:30 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-tsQ6GA511zOrjkHauzj9-3xkLu4nROr9KJvWatxjF9Ew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:37 AM Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, I wasn't very confident about this either. I just wrote it to reduce the test footprint in the reproducer. I think we can simply include a lot more data and do the copy via stdin.
That is one way and if we don't find any better way we can do that.
> Alternatively, we can reduce logical_decoding_work_mem minimum value and run the test with a smaller value. But that same GUC is used to decide spilling txn to disk as well. So I am not sure if reducing the compile time default is acceptable or not.
In the test decoding config, it is already set to a minimum value which is 64k.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-05-26 06:43:03 | Re: pg_rewind fails if there is a read only file. |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-05-26 06:23:09 | Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data |