Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data
Date: 2021-05-26 06:25:30
Message-ID: CAFiTN-tsQ6GA511zOrjkHauzj9-3xkLu4nROr9KJvWatxjF9Ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:37 AM Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>

>
> Yeah, I wasn't very confident about this either. I just wrote it to reduce the test footprint in the reproducer. I think we can simply include a lot more data and do the copy via stdin.

That is one way and if we don't find any better way we can do that.

> Alternatively, we can reduce logical_decoding_work_mem minimum value and run the test with a smaller value. But that same GUC is used to decide spilling txn to disk as well. So I am not sure if reducing the compile time default is acceptable or not.

In the test decoding config, it is already set to a minimum value which is 64k.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2021-05-26 06:43:03 Re: pg_rewind fails if there is a read only file.
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-05-26 06:23:09 Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data