From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index |
Date: | 2020-10-27 14:11:40 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+oSbSRJ5gmT1y7mNDde+WpQdCDsQMLbj7ZKLxJYYB2rmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:12 AM Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 3:08 PM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Would be nice if add some information about it into our docs but not
sure where. I'm thinking about:
>> - doc/src/sgml/ref/create_index.sgml
>> - doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml (routine-reindex)
>
>
> Attaching the patches for the docs, one for 11 and older, and another for
12+ (which have REINDEX CONCURRENTLY not suffering from lack of ANALYZE).
>
Actually the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY suffers with the lack of ANALYZE. See my
previous message on this thread.
So just adding the note on the ANALYZE docs is enough.
> I still think that automating is the right thing to do but of course,
it's a much bigger topic that a quick fix dor the docs.
So what we need to do is see how to fix REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
PostgreSQL Developer at OnGres Inc. - https://ongres.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-27 14:19:34 | Re: Question about make coverage-html |
Previous Message | Ibrar Ahmed | 2020-10-27 14:11:02 | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |