Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index
Date: 2020-10-27 14:11:40
Message-ID: CAFcNs+oSbSRJ5gmT1y7mNDde+WpQdCDsQMLbj7ZKLxJYYB2rmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:12 AM Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 3:08 PM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Would be nice if add some information about it into our docs but not
sure where. I'm thinking about:
>> - doc/src/sgml/ref/create_index.sgml
>> - doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml (routine-reindex)
>
>
> Attaching the patches for the docs, one for 11 and older, and another for
12+ (which have REINDEX CONCURRENTLY not suffering from lack of ANALYZE).
>

Actually the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY suffers with the lack of ANALYZE. See my
previous message on this thread.

So just adding the note on the ANALYZE docs is enough.

> I still think that automating is the right thing to do but of course,
it's a much bigger topic that a quick fix dor the docs.

So what we need to do is see how to fix REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
PostgreSQL Developer at OnGres Inc. - https://ongres.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-27 14:19:34 Re: Question about make coverage-html
Previous Message Ibrar Ahmed 2020-10-27 14:11:02 Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?