| From: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |
| Date: | 2021-04-09 02:59:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAFPTHDZ-COtRseZ41HRRPqekD-MWgD5WpJFNLkDzA16fMqtcVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:23 AM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I didn't like this style because it is not descriptive enough. It is also
> not a
> style adopted by Postgres. I suggest to add something like "This field was
> introduced in version 2" or "This field is available since version 2"
> after the
> field description.
>
I have updated this to "Since protocol version 2"
>
> + Xid of the sub-transaction (will be same as xid of the
> transaction for top-level
> + transactions).
> +</para>
>
> Although, sub-transaction is also used in the documentation, I suggest to
> use
> subtransaction. Maybe change the other sub-transaction occurrences too.
>
Updated.
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-doc-Update-information-of-new-messages-for-logica.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-04-09 03:08:01 | Re: Why is Query NOT getting cancelled with SIGINT in PG14? |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-04-09 02:54:51 | Why is Query NOT getting cancelled with SIGINT in PG14? |