Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:29 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:23 AM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I didn't like this style because it is not descriptive enough. It is also not a
>> style adopted by Postgres. I suggest to add something like "This field was
>> introduced in version 2" or "This field is available since version 2" after the
>> field description.
>
>
> I have updated this to "Since protocol version 2"
>>
>>
>> + Xid of the sub-transaction (will be same as xid of the transaction for top-level
>> + transactions).
>> +</para>
>>
>> Although, sub-transaction is also used in the documentation, I suggest to use
>> subtransaction. Maybe change the other sub-transaction occurrences too.
>
>
> Updated.
>

I don't like repeating the same thing for all new messages. So added
separate para for the same and few other changes. See what do you
think of the attached?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.