Re: cutting down the TODO list thread

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date: 2020-10-30 15:37:59
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGXZvu9pdcpKUXD49ThPSzqX5S-vJJfUbD4JeG2S+L-eg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:57 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2020-10-28 16:20:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I would personally prefer a completely seprate page
>
> Same.
>

Ok, that's two votes for a separate page, and one for a new section on the
same page, so it looks like it's a new page. That being the case, I would
think it logical to move "features we don't want" there. As for the name,
we should probably encompass both "won't fix" bugs and features not wanted.
Maybe "past development ideas" or "not worth doing", but I'm open to better
ideas. Once that's agreed upon, I'll make a new page and migrate the items
over, minus the two that were mentioned upthread.

--
John Naylor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Georgios Kokolatos 2020-10-30 15:54:54 Re: Consistent error reporting for encryption/decryption in pgcrypto
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-10-30 15:07:07 Re: Autovacuum worker doesn't immediately exit on postmaster death