| From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inline Extension |
| Date: | 2012-01-28 21:22:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAF6yO=0i9vQRYfjGkKsL49678Azk67W0A5Y5RcqQwGz550-eCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le 28 janvier 2012 21:46, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> a écrit :
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 2:19 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>
>>> Also --exclude-extension?
>>
>> It might be the default.
>> We need something to dump the content of
>> pg_catalog.pg_extension_script (or whatever table is going to contain
>> SQL code), per extension or all.
>
> I think dim said --no-extensions would be the default, but I’m thinking it would be useful to have --with-extensions to include them all, but then be able to --exclude-extension for a select few.
So I am.
--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-01-28 21:23:17 | Re: CLOG contention |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-28 21:08:36 | isolationtester seems uselessly rigid as to length of permutation |