Re: Postgres 10 disk space requirement compared to postgres 9.5.4

Thanks Mark, that is what I was asking.

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Mark Kirkwood <
mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:

> I think people have been answering a question that is different from what
> you are asking.
>
> It looks to me like you are asking something to the effect: *After*
> upgrading to Postgres 10 - will I use more disk space than 9.5?
>
> I don't believe that there have been significant changes in storage space
> allocation between 9.5 and 10, so your tables should be the same size. e.g
> I frequently create a database using pgbench scale 100. it has used 1.5 GB
> of disk for all the version of Postgres that I have used (and that is quite
> a few)!
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 03/08/18 15:57, Debraj Manna wrote:
>
>> Anyone any thoughts on this?
>>
>> On Thu 2 Aug, 2018, 7:57 PM Debraj Manna, <subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com
>> <mailto:subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On moving from postgres 9.5.4 to postgres 10.x we have to do data
>> migration.
>>
>> Can some one let me know will the disk space requirement remain
>> same for same set of tables with same number of rows in postgres
>> 10.x and postgres 9.5.4 ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>