From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Debraj Manna <subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 10 disk space requirement compared to postgres 9.5.4 |
Date: | 2018-08-03 04:41:24 |
Message-ID: | 8364f37d-0d54-096f-8ab2-6d994e616e7f@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I think people have been answering a question that is different from
what you are asking.
It looks to me like you are asking something to the effect: *After*
upgrading to Postgres 10 - will I use more disk space than 9.5?
I don't believe that there have been significant changes in storage
space allocation between 9.5 and 10, so your tables should be the same
size. e.g I frequently create a database using pgbench scale 100. it has
used 1.5 GB of disk for all the version of Postgres that I have used
(and that is quite a few)!
Cheers
Mark
On 03/08/18 15:57, Debraj Manna wrote:
> Anyone any thoughts on this?
>
> On Thu 2 Aug, 2018, 7:57 PM Debraj Manna, <subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On moving from postgres 9.5.4 to postgres 10.x we have to do data
> migration.
>
> Can some one let me know will the disk space requirement remain
> same for same set of tables with same number of rows in postgres
> 10.x and postgres 9.5.4 ?
>
> Thanks,
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Debraj Manna | 2018-08-03 06:37:35 | Re: Postgres 10 disk space requirement compared to postgres 9.5.4 |
Previous Message | Debraj Manna | 2018-08-03 04:27:32 | Re: Postgres 10 disk space requirement compared to postgres 9.5.4 |