Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> What led you to choose the ? operator for the FOLLOWED BY semantics?
> It doesn't seem a terribly natural choice -- most other things seems to
> use ? as some sort of wildcard. What about something like "...", so you
> would do
> SELECT q @@ to_tsquery('fatal ... error');
> and
> SELECT q @@ (tsquery 'fatal' ... tsquery 'error');
>
>
originally was $, but then we change it to ?, we don't remember why. During
warming-up this morning we came to other suggestion

SELECT q @@ to_tsquery('fatal <> error');
and
SELECT q @@ to_tsquery('fatal <2> error');

How about this ?

> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>