| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
| Date: | 2016-04-01 08:35:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20160401083518.GE9074@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-04-01 13:50:10 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I think it needs more number of runs.. After seeing this results I did not
> run head+pinunpin,
>
> Head 64 Client 128 Client
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Run1 434860 356945
> Run2 275815 *275815*
> Run3 437872 366560
> Patch 64 Client 128 Client
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Run1 429520 372958
> Run2 446249 *167189*
> Run3 431066 381592
> Patch+Pinunpin 64 Client 128 Client
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Run1 338298 642535
> Run2 406240 644187
> Run3 595439 *285420 *
Could you describe the exact setup a bit more? Postgres settings,
pgbench parameters, etc.
What's the size of BufferDesc after applying the patch?
Thanks,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-04-01 08:36:29 | Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-04-01 08:21:46 | Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |