Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!

From: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Date: 2015-09-29 20:36:53
Message-ID: CAF4Au4wAJL+o3s+0Q-iUnPR=hzO_fRr=oHAwWcwjVYaJ1NjyiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/29/2015 10:55 AM, Steve Crawford wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:16 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org <mailto:
>> david(at)fetter(dot)org>> wrote:
>>
>> ...What we're not fine with is depending on a proprietary system, no
>> matter what type of license, as infrastructure...
>>
>>
>> Exactly. Which is why I was warning about latching onto features only
>> available in the closed enterprise version.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Like Tom, I more or less promised myself not to get terribly involved in
> this discussion. Oh, well.
>

me too, but I have to mention one problem we should have in mind - it's
independency from political games (sanctions). Think about developers from
Russia, who one day may be blocked by Github, for example.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2015-09-29 20:39:57 Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-29 20:15:54 Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness