| From: | solai v <solai(dot)cdac(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bernd Reiß <bd_reiss(at)gmx(dot)at>, Ahmed Gouda <ahmed(dot)gouda(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, songjinzhou <tsinghualucky912(at)foxmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] New pg_stat_tablespace view |
| Date: | 2026-09-21 11:23:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAF0whuf0JgXROvYOJLjjW_LMWtKYm0reJkgyABOzafAOfRKSFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 10:45 AM shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bernd,
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> > blks_read differs exactly by 3 and blks_hit by 7
>
> I can reproduce this, and it does not need a restart. pg_stat_reset()
> clears the database entry and pg_stat_reset_shared() clears the tablespace
> entry. If more than a second passes between them, the backend flushes its
> pending counts in the gap, and the entry that was reset first keeps them.
> Swapping the two resets flips the sign. With both resets in one statement
> the numbers always match.
>
> > there is some skew in blk_read_time and blk_write_time
>
> Part of it was the second clock read. v7 reuses the time that
> pgstat_count_io_op_time() already computed.
>
>
> > one test still checks for >= 0
>
> Fixed.
>
> v7 attached.
>
Thank you for the updated patch. I tested the v7 patch and verified
that the regression suite completed successfully, with all 239 tests
passing, including the stats and tablespace tests. I also performed
targeted testing using a dedicated tablespace. The view reported
tuple activity for inserts, updates, and deletes, along with nonzero
block-write timing when I/O timing was enabled. The checkpoint
completed successfully, and the server log showed no errors in the
inspected output. After testing, I dropped the test table and
tablespace and shut down the separate test server cleanly. One concern
is that this targeted workload did not demonstrate nonzero
physical-read counters or read timing. Apart from this limitation, I
did not observe any functional or regression errors in the tests I
performed.
Regards,
Solai
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2026-09-21 11:38:21 | Re: Stabilize and shorten test_checksums/013_rewind test |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-09-21 11:23:04 | Re: Correct some doc items due to the REPACK |