Correct comment wording in extension.c

From: albert tan <alterttan1223(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Correct comment wording in extension.c
Date: 2026-01-07 06:12:50
Message-ID: CAEzortnJB7aue6miGT_xU2KLb3okoKgkBe4EzJ6yJ=Y8LMB7gw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Hackers,
I think I've found a small issue.

When studying the following comment:
' The control file will be search on Extension_control_path paths if
control->control_dir is NULL, otherwise it will use the value of
control_dir
to read and parse the .control file, so it assume that the control_dir is
a
valid path for the control file being parsed.' in the extension.c

I think there are some minor errors in this sentence.
I believe:
'will be searched' is better than 'will be search'.
'it assumes' is better than 'it assume'.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Modify-comments-words-in-extension.c.patch application/octet-stream 1.3 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-01-07 06:42:20 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message Dewei Dai 2026-01-07 06:09:57 Re: Is this a memory leak in libpqrcv_processTuples()?