| From: | albert tan <alterttan1223(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Correct comment wording in extension.c |
| Date: | 2026-01-07 06:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAEzortnJB7aue6miGT_xU2KLb3okoKgkBe4EzJ6yJ=Y8LMB7gw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hackers,
I think I've found a small issue.
When studying the following comment:
' The control file will be search on Extension_control_path paths if
control->control_dir is NULL, otherwise it will use the value of
control_dir
to read and parse the .control file, so it assume that the control_dir is
a
valid path for the control file being parsed.' in the extension.c
I think there are some minor errors in this sentence.
I believe:
'will be searched' is better than 'will be search'.
'it assumes' is better than 'it assume'.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Modify-comments-words-in-extension.c.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-01-07 06:42:20 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Dewei Dai | 2026-01-07 06:09:57 | Re: Is this a memory leak in libpqrcv_processTuples()? |