Re: jsonb problematic operators

From: Geoff Winkless <gwinkless(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb problematic operators
Date: 2016-12-11 10:52:26
Message-ID: CAEzk6fe0=xu+kh0j8uMJ-NwUd=+952tLe-HvCPHCsJsMGnLa+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9 Dec 2016 17:54, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

On 2016-12-09 12:17:32 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> As Geoff says, you don't have to use the operators; you could use the
> equivalent functions instead. Every operator just gets turned into a
> function call internally, so this is always possible.

Well, except that only operators support indexing :(

Really? Seems like an odd design decision.

The only other simple suggestion then would be to use PDO named parameters
instead of positional ones. Much nicer syntax anyway, IMO.

Geoff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2016-12-11 16:36:17 Re: snapbuild woes
Previous Message Andrew Borodin 2016-12-11 10:38:41 Re: background sessions