| From: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds |
| Date: | 2021-06-02 15:48:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAEze2WgJ8qfOkvpQqDCNXww5WxXy5Y0qLafziJXPjA2SP2vCwA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 17:42, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 6/2/21 4:54 PM, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 15:23, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >
> > After looking at it a bit more, it seems like a solution was actually
> > easier than I'd expected. PFA a prototype (unvalidated, but
> > check-world -ed) patch that would add these subphases of progress
> > reporting, which can be backpatched down to 12.
> >
>
> Nice. I gave it a try on the database I'm experimenting with, and it
> seems to be working fine. Please add it to the next CF.
Thanks, cf available here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3149/
With regards,
Matthias van de Meent
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2021-06-02 16:26:41 | speed up verifying UTF-8 |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-06-02 15:42:29 | Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds |