Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
Date: 2021-06-02 15:42:29
Message-ID: 0fe69bec-95b7-f589-6d91-00320b1d59f9@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/2/21 4:54 PM, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 15:23, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>
> After looking at it a bit more, it seems like a solution was actually
> easier than I'd expected. PFA a prototype (unvalidated, but
> check-world -ed) patch that would add these subphases of progress
> reporting, which can be backpatched down to 12.
>

Nice. I gave it a try on the database I'm experimenting with, and it
seems to be working fine. Please add it to the next CF.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2021-06-02 15:48:38 Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-06-02 15:22:11 Re: Support for CREATE MODULE?