| From: | Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: patch proposal |
| Date: | 2017-02-22 02:10:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAEyp7J_+u0PKgUaR10eUcjJ=v5aHc8Ui4b_9L1gbuEttcCwtkQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:49 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> > On 1/27/17 3:19 AM, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
> >> I have split the patch into two different
> >> pieces. One is to determine if the recovery can start at all and other
> >> patch deals with the incomplete recovery situation.
> >
> > I think the first patch looks promising and I would rather work through
> > that before considering the second patch. Once there are tests for the
> > first patch I will complete my review.
>
> Based on that, I am moving the patch to next CF with "Needs Review".
> Venkata, please be careful in updating correctly the patch status, it
> was still on "Waiting on Author".
>
Apologies. Sure. Will make a note.
Regards,
Venkata B N
Database Consultant
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-22 02:14:41 | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |
| Previous Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-02-22 02:09:28 | Re: patch proposal |