Re: patch proposal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: patch proposal
Date: 2017-01-30 23:41:49
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQAQ-zipXDAsYkCWdWS7fpqG6UQO_bFzR3VqBGaf1J_0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:49 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 1/27/17 3:19 AM, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
>> I have split the patch into two different
>> pieces. One is to determine if the recovery can start at all and other
>> patch deals with the incomplete recovery situation.
>
> I think the first patch looks promising and I would rather work through
> that before considering the second patch. Once there are tests for the
> first patch I will complete my review.

Based on that, I am moving the patch to next CF with "Needs Review".
Venkata, please be careful in updating correctly the patch status, it
was still on "Waiting on Author".
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-01-30 23:47:49 Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Previous Message Nikita Glukhov 2017-01-30 23:07:43 [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST