| From: | lakshmi <lakshmigcdac(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use log_newpage_range in HASH index build |
| Date: | 2026-04-27 17:10:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAEvyyThYHLTqQP7mebf=9C7EBSNJ6mMsrtvEmhbtDub3KQ0w4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> It is probably best to start a separate email thread specifically
> about this patch, because it's doing something quite different from
> the original patch. I suggest presenting some specific performance
> results, as it's not very clear how much benefit this might have. It
> might be good to test a favorable scenario and also an unfavorable
> scenario, describing and showing results for each.
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I’ll start a separate thread for this patch
> with performance results.
>
> Regards,
> Lakshmi
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2026-04-27 18:00:00 | Re: Startup process deadlock: WaitForProcSignalBarriers vs aux process |
| Previous Message | SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM | 2026-04-27 17:02:41 | Re: [Patch]: Fix excessive ProcArrayLock acquisitions with subscription max_retention_duration=0 |