Re: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”

From: lakshmi <lakshmigcdac(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "Masashi Kamura (Fujitsu)" <kamura(dot)masashi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”
Date: 2026-04-24 07:18:41
Message-ID: CAEvyyTgveaJzjBVsu9mWduCJi9Efo1HmyxUiLRNcB29x=kDAKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 10:24 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <
kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:

> Dear Kamura-san,
>
> > For the reasons above, I would like to proceed with the policy of
> treating
> > this as a syntax error.
>
> Make sense, so the v1 patch is usable as-is. It looks good to me.
>
>
> Handling this as a syntax error seems like a reasonable and consistent
approach, especially given the undefined behavior and alignment with other
systems like Pro*C.

The proposed patch looks good to me.

Regards,
Lakshmi G

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-04-24 07:32:38 Property graph: fix error handling when dropping non-existent label property
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-04-24 07:18:12 Re: Bug: pg_get_viewdef() fails on GRAPH_TABLE views with lateral column references