Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks
Date: 2020-01-28 21:08:17
Message-ID: CAEudQApySs14h9vyCd0zvxOBK5GFrocM8n3C+4BTXBJ+DhDLGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em ter., 28 de jan. de 2020 às 17:54, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:13 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
> > No, that's not right. I think that it is possible to loop over
> > ShmemProtectiveRegion in some cases. And actually, your patch is dead
> > wrong because this is some code called by the postmaster and it cannot
> > use FATAL.
>
> Uh, really? I am not aware of such a rule.
>
> Well, in postmaster.c has a structure that makes use of the variable
ShmemProtectiveRegion, I think it is related to the function in
src/backend/port/win32_shmem.c.
On line 575 in src / backend / port / win32_shmem.c, there is a comment
that tells to not use FATAL.
"Don't use FATAL since we're running in the postmaster."

regards,
Ranier Vilela

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-01-28 21:11:47 Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-01-28 21:06:17 Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks