Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Date: 2025-09-17 02:08:28
Message-ID: CAEoWx2kRQxup6Ykx2fdRSu=sU6Jcu0D2Z-PaBN-ta91Aa-Pu+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi John,

On Sep 16, 2025, at 17:36, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

The comment change seems like it belongs in the preparatory commit
anyway, so I put the links there and pushed 0001 (along with the
squashed 0002).

Thank you very much for pushing 0001.

I see you have updated the function comment in utf8_and_gb18030.c, so I
removed it from the v8 patch.

Attached is the v8 patch:

* Updated the commit comment by taking your wording
* Removed the change of utf8_and_gb18030.c

Please take a look again, and thanks for your patience.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Update-GB18030-encoding-from-version-2000-to-2022.patch application/octet-stream 459.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2025-09-17 02:28:14 pgbench: remove an unused function argument
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-09-17 02:01:03 Re: REPACK and naming