Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Date: 2017-12-08 19:22:54
Message-ID: CAEepm=3vZUm1+F1OC_zAA98v8v7DuD1B7ZQx3Hd==g2PAhuG+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The regression test added by patch needs cleanup at the end which I
>> have added in the attached patch.
>
> OK, so you've got a test case now, but Thomas independently submitted
> a test case patch. Which one is more awesome? :-)

My test case is for Hash nodes and Amit's is for Sort nodes. Surely
both should be covered?

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-12-08 19:26:00 Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-12-08 19:20:42 Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit