| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com |
| Date: | 2017-12-08 19:31:52 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobDgkiLdY+Aua-POnBmorjjbY83PXdUJOBNbif4PnePRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> The regression test added by patch needs cleanup at the end which I
>>> have added in the attached patch.
>>
>> OK, so you've got a test case now, but Thomas independently submitted
>> a test case patch. Which one is more awesome? :-)
>
> My test case is for Hash nodes and Amit's is for Sort nodes. Surely
> both should be covered?
Oh, yeah. I totally missed that detail, sorry.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robins Tharakan | 2017-12-08 19:32:41 | Typo in recent commit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-08 19:26:00 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |