Re: Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rosser Schwarz <rosser(dot)schwarz(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical
Date: 2017-09-09 04:05:57
Message-ID: CAEepm=01XRHpnjn_o4P6G3Rkr63jX5DwcrTErOOzQOSXMzpUCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> <varlistentry>
> + <term><option>--if-exists</option></term>
> + <listitem>
> + <para>
> + Do not error out when <option>--drop-slot</option> or
> <option>--start<option> are
> + specified and a slot with the specified name does not exist.
> + </para>
> + </listitem>
> + </varlistentry>
>
> I understand the --drop-slot part. But I don't understand what it means
> to ignore a missing replication slot when running --start.

Also "<option>--start<option>" breaks the documentation build (missing
slash on the closing tag).

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-09 04:18:01 Re: Still another race condition in recovery TAP tests
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-09-09 03:35:40 Re: Cached plans and statement generalization