Re: PG 10: could not generate random cancel key

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 10: could not generate random cancel key
Date: 2018-07-18 13:07:44
Message-ID: CAEZATCW4tvjBqpWzxzhPnBa0WMSqS3uCeXGy+iFaDX+ThAVW4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18 July 2018 at 14:01, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Thanks for the updated version. This looks safer to me. It is possible
> to simplify the code by removing the external RAND_status() call and
> check for RAND_status() first in the loop as per the attached.

OK, thanks.

Barring any further comments, I'll push and back-patch this to v10
later this week.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-07-18 13:29:01 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-07-18 13:06:22 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?