Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Date: 2026-01-25 10:03:05
Message-ID: CAEZATCW+acBq6rV6vQ+9Pr+NyjaGaiS9Kg3twzDY8vQXQ_xTtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 00:57, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> > On Jan 24, 2026, at 18:37, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >> In [1] Dean said he's expects to have to push an amendment to
> >> .abi-compliance-history soon. But then the discussion got a bit derailed
> >> because one of the complaints being reported is bogus, as the struct is only
> >> defined in a .c file.
>
> > Cool, hopefully we’re back on track then.
>
> But the report you pointed to is complaining about both structs,
> which I'd not expect to happen if you installed that patch I
> proposed.
>

Yes, the most recent check on baza [1] is still incorrectly
complaining about both structs.

I have prepared a patch for .abi-compliance-history, but I'll hold off
on pushing it.

Regards,
Dean

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=baza&dt=2026-01-25%2003%3A22%3A35

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2026-01-25 10:14:57 Re: Fix a reference error for window functions: In the function 'find_window_functions', the deduplication logic should be removed
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-01-25 07:41:22 Re: pg_stat_statements: add missing tests for nesting_level