Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Date: 2026-01-25 00:56:52
Message-ID: 3497234.1769302612@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> On Jan 24, 2026, at 18:37, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> In [1] Dean said he's expects to have to push an amendment to
>> .abi-compliance-history soon. But then the discussion got a bit derailed
>> because one of the complaints being reported is bogus, as the struct is only
>> defined in a .c file.

> Cool, hopefully we’re back on track then.

But the report you pointed to is complaining about both structs,
which I'd not expect to happen if you installed that patch I
proposed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-01-25 01:02:44 Re: Time to drop RADIUS support?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-01-25 00:54:36 Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)