Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date: 2011-08-04 13:17:23
Message-ID: CAEYLb_WYvjnQUr3PF0E=GX0dg9Q8reLgx4OtOkG5ANhktXOTmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4 August 2011 13:57, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh, I see.  Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
> in.  The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me
> either.

Idiomatic win32 code uses BOOL and TRUE/FALSE. They are macros defined
somewhere or other.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-08-04 13:40:28 Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2011-08-04 13:07:37 plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https