| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false |
| Date: | 2011-08-04 12:57:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoba-ZN2SQuWV8sy3_tYzKsUio=94+EufSnamj45DunJ8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
>> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
>>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
>> I believe I already did. See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
>
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.
Oh, I see. Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
in. The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me
either.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2011-08-04 13:07:37 | plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2011-08-04 12:44:35 | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false |