| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft release notes complete |
| Date: | 2012-05-10 13:12:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_V8_WKo0O6Rg_fp0K7zjHeaNOt=g0RFAQf_bj55Oos9VA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 May 2012 13:45, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Right, but I think it would be good to identify them explicitly as reviewers
> if we're going to include the names.
+1. I think we should probably do more to credit reviewers. It's not
uncommon for a reviewer to end up becoming a co-author, particularly
if they're a committer, but it's a little misleading to add a reviewer
after the feature description without qualifying that they are the
reviewer.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-05-10 13:20:32 | Re: Draft release notes complete |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-05-10 13:05:10 | Re: Draft release notes complete |