Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I do not think this is a great idea. We don't use the tupdesc today
> perhaps, but it's plausible that it'd be needed in the future.
> Different table AMs might have different sets of system columns.
Thank you for your guidance.I didn't consider that different table AMs
might store system column information in tupdesc before.