Re: Patch to avoid SIGQUIT accident

From: Renato dos Santos <shazaum(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to avoid SIGQUIT accident
Date: 2018-10-22 00:02:04
Message-ID: CAE4ch_WjPADsXvrZ5qfRO_sHHWyPHW+a4pMN6MFYPz6MVd4=OA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I agree with your arguments, and if instead we put an option to disable
this before compiling or a set in the psql cli?

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018, 20:20 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Renato dos Santos <shazaum(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I have been using psql for quite a few days. And I have accidentally
> pressed the CTRL + \ keys that sends the signal QUIT+Coredump (CTRL+4 also
> sends the same signal).
> > I hope it's relevant to more people. (This has bothered me.)
>
> > this patch avoids the output of the CLI using ctrl + \ is the same as
> ctrl + c
>
> I'm fairly confused about why this would be a good idea, for several
> reasons:
>
> * If you have a tendency to make that typo, why would you want a fix that
> only affects psql and not any of your other applications? (If you do
> want the latter, there are already ways to do it, eg you could remap
> SIGQUIT to some other key via stty, or disable core dumps via ulimit.)
>
> * If we put this in, what becomes of people who actually want a core dump,
> eg for debugging?
>
> * SIGQUIT is a fairly well-known way to get out of an application when all
> else fails. People who aren't familiar with psql's exit commands might
> find it pretty unfriendly of us to block this off.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-22 00:39:56 Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-10-21 23:20:45 Re: Patch to avoid SIGQUIT accident