Re: logical: fix recomputation required LSN on restart_lsn-only advancement

From: Hu Xunqi <huxunqi(dot)08(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical: fix recomputation required LSN on restart_lsn-only advancement
Date: 2026-04-21 05:30:39
Message-ID: CAE4_qQa7ZE-kMo8JkxxDrtxGgwWEpx1QjGKtcrY9dDia15pGZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 10:16 AM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While reading logical replication code, I found an issue in
> LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation().
>
> In LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation(), updated_restart is tracked
> independently from updated_xmin, and the slot is marked dirty and saved
> when either one changed. But after that,
> ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() is still only called inside "if
> (updated_xmin)”.
>
> So for the restart-only case:
>
> * updated_restart = true
> * updated_xmin = false
> * ReplicationSlotSave() runs
> * ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() does not run because updated_xmin
> is false
>
> That means the global retention point managed by
> XLogSetReplicationSlotMinimumLSN() can stay stale until some later
> unrelated event recomputes it. Since ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN()
> derives the global minimum from slot restat_lsn, skipping it after a
> restart-only advance can retain excess WAL and may lead to WAL bloat.
>
> This patch fixes the problem by moving
> ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredLSN() under “if (updated_restart)”.
>
> Looks like this issue has been there for a long time, so if this analysis
> is correct, it may also be worth back-patching.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Chao Li (Evan)
> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
> https://www.highgo.com/
>
>
I think this change is reasonable.
This makes the recomputation condition match the state it actually depends
on.

Regards,
Xunqi Hu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2026-04-21 05:33:53 Re: [Bug][patch]: After dropping the last label from a property graph element, invoking pg_get_propgraphdef() triggers an assertion failure
Previous Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-04-21 05:03:48 Re: [PATCH] postmaster: fix stale PM_STARTUP comment