Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2025-11-30 12:11:06
Message-ID: CADzfLwVj6g0ROHEqEHgOU7C7Wc7mYot0cVi3jz5CzTSzQfPUqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello!

On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 6:48 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> Looking at 0004, I think IsIndexCompatibleAsArbiter() should map the
> attribute numbers, in case the partition has a different column layout
> than the parent (e.g. in case there are dropped columns or just
> different column orders)

Oh, yes, you're right. I'll prepare an updated version (also it looks
like some inner loops may be refactored in a more effective way).

Best regards,
Mikhail.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2025-11-30 12:15:42 Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server
Previous Message Jim Jones 2025-11-30 10:59:57 Re: [PoC] XMLCast (SQL/XML X025)