Re: Time-Delayed Standbys

2013/12/12 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>

> On 12 December 2013 10:42, KONDO Mitsumasa
> <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> >> I agree with your request here, but I don't think negative values are
> >> the right way to implement that, at least it would not be very usable.
> >
> > I think that my proposal is the easiest and simplist way to solve this
> > problem. And I believe that the man who cannot calculate the difference
> in
> > time-zone doesn't set replication cluster across continents.
> >
> >
> >> My suggestion would be to add the TZ to the checkpoint record. This
> >> way all users of WAL can see the TZ of the master and act accordingly.
> >> I'll do a separate patch for that.
> >
> > It is something useful for also other situations. However, it might be
> > going to happen long and complicated discussions... I think that our
> hope is
> > to commit this patch in this commit-fest or next final commit-fest.
>
> Agreed on no delay for the delay patch, as shown by my commit.

Our forecast was very accurate...
Nice commit, Thanks!

Regards,
--
Mitsumasa KONDO
NTT Open Source Software Center