Re: Optimize kernel readahead using buffer access strategy

From: Mitsumasa KONDO <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimize kernel readahead using buffer access strategy
Date: 2013-12-12 13:43:02
Message-ID: CADupcHUgh=tJEiEqjeMWEkW8fgb7tV0Ue16G1aVsy2H7OCyiNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2013/12/12 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>

> On 14 November 2013 12:09, KONDO Mitsumasa
> <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> > For your information of effect of this patch, I got results of pgbench
> which are
> > in-memory-size database and out-memory-size database, and postgresql.conf
> > settings are always used by us. It seems to improve performance to a
> better. And
> > I think that this feature is going to be necessary for business
> intelligence
> > which will be realized at PostgreSQL version 10. I seriously believe
> Simon's
> > presentation in PostgreSQL conference Europe 2013! It was very
> exciting!!!
>
> Thank you.
>
> I like the sound of this patch, sorry I've not been able to help as yet.
>
> Your tests seem to relate to pgbench. Do we have tests on more BI related
> tasks?
>
Yes, off-course! We will need another benchmark test before conclusion of
this patch.
What kind of benchmark do you have?

Regards,
--
Mitsumasa KONDO
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitsumasa KONDO 2013-12-12 13:46:28 Re: Time-Delayed Standbys
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-12-12 13:20:51 Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?