From: | Apple Pine <applesolvent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin 4? |
Date: | 2025-09-04 16:08:23 |
Message-ID: | CADe3gzVv4AeYDapOeKX5AotAQ+c7=XNQJ-_hML9acGVxAy72jQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
I forgot how mailing lists work.
So pgAdmin III uses C++ and wxWidgets and pgAdmin 4 uses web-based
technologies?
That's interesting but the question is, will there be a pgAdmin 5? If a web
based model is the future, then why shouldn't we say pgAdmin v10 or simply
pgAdmin 10?
My question should lead to another question: Will there be a pgAdmin 5?
Sincerely
Am Fr., 29. Aug. 2025 um 08:35 Uhr schrieb Ashesh Vashi <
ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:42 PM Apple Pine <applesolvent(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 v9.7.
>>
>> in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore pgAdmin 4 is the most use
>> tool for postgres. it's confusing if you write pgAdmin 4 and then the
>> version number.
>>
>> it should be able to understand what pgAdmin 9.7 means. it means pgAdmin
>> 4 in the version 9.7. I suggest you to change the name of pgAdmin 4 at
>> least in version 10.
>>
>> so instead of pgAdmin 4 v10 simply write pgAdmin 10.
>>
> There is a history behind everything. :)
> Please find the blog from Dave Page:
> https://pgsnake.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-story-of-pgadmin.html
>
> This is the fourth revision of pgAdmin, hence - pgAdmin 4.
> And - rest are the current version of this edition.
>
> -- Ashesh
>
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2025-09-05 08:57:10 | Re: pgAdmin 4? |
Previous Message | Khushboo Vashi | 2025-09-04 11:02:23 | pgAdmin 4 v9.8 Released |