From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Apple Pine <applesolvent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin 4? |
Date: | 2025-09-05 08:57:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxowMzMZ9OzjzAFPrEqa+aXotNs_2u=tYmzWLRSCzGri6ig@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 17:08, Apple Pine <applesolvent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I forgot how mailing lists work.
>
> So pgAdmin III uses C++ and wxWidgets and pgAdmin 4 uses web-based
> technologies?
>
Yes.
>
> That's interesting but the question is, will there be a pgAdmin 5?
>
It's not impossible. There have been 3 other complete rewrites over the
last 28 years after all (4, if you count to original rewrite of pgManager
to pgAdmin I).
> If a web based model is the future, then why shouldn't we say pgAdmin v10
> or simply pgAdmin 10?
>
In another 50 years we might - and I say that only half-jokingly, as I
certainly didn't expect pgAdmin to still be an active project with millions
of downloads after nearly 30 years. Will pgAdmin be around in another 50
years? I doubt it, but I'm not going to definitively say no.
>
> My question should lead to another question: Will there be a pgAdmin 5?
>
Maybe - who knows what the future will hold, or what technology changes
might force another rewrite?
>
> Sincerely
>
> Am Fr., 29. Aug. 2025 um 08:35 Uhr schrieb Ashesh Vashi <
> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:42 PM Apple Pine <applesolvent(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 v9.7.
>>>
>>> in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore pgAdmin 4 is the most use
>>> tool for postgres. it's confusing if you write pgAdmin 4 and then the
>>> version number.
>>>
>>> it should be able to understand what pgAdmin 9.7 means. it means pgAdmin
>>> 4 in the version 9.7. I suggest you to change the name of pgAdmin 4 at
>>> least in version 10.
>>>
>>> so instead of pgAdmin 4 v10 simply write pgAdmin 10.
>>>
>> There is a history behind everything. :)
>> Please find the blog from Dave Page:
>> https://pgsnake.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-story-of-pgadmin.html
>>
>> This is the fourth revision of pgAdmin, hence - pgAdmin 4.
>> And - rest are the current version of this edition.
>>
>> -- Ashesh
>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely
>>>
>>
--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2025-09-05 11:06:24 | Re: Support for Intune setup |
Previous Message | Apple Pine | 2025-09-04 16:08:23 | Re: pgAdmin 4? |