Re: Using defines for protocol characters

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date: 2023-08-03 21:22:51
Message-ID: CADK3HHLtFuq8PDsV0+ryoqpSxnnPVrS752q5ra9QZ-SiLqVUXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 13:25, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

> > Greetings,
> >
> > Attached is a patch which introduces a file protocol.h. Instead of using
> > the actual characters everywhere in the code this patch names the
> > characters and removes the comments beside each usage.
>
> > +#define DESCRIBE_PREPARED 'S'
> > +#define DESCRIBE_PORTAL 'P'
>
> You use these for Close message as well. I don't like the idea because
> Close is different message from Describe message.
>
> What about adding following for Close too use them instead?
>
> #define CLOSE_PREPARED 'S'
> #define CLOSE_PORTAL 'P'
>

Good catch.
I recall when writing this it was a bit hacky.
What do you think of PREPARED_SUB_COMMAND and PORTAL_SUB_COMMAND instead
of duplicating them ?

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-08-03 21:28:51 Re: Fix incorrect start up costs for WindowAgg paths (bug #17862)
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-03 21:08:27 Re: Track Oldest Initialized WAL Buffer Page