Re: Track Oldest Initialized WAL Buffer Page

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Track Oldest Initialized WAL Buffer Page
Date: 2023-08-03 21:08:27
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3 Jul 2023, at 15:27, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> But I don't see the point of tracking OldestInitializedPage. It seems cheap enough that we could, if there's a need for it, but I don't see the need.

Based on the above comments, and the thread stalling, I am marking this
returned with feedback. Please feel free to continue the discussion here and
re-open a new entry in a future CF if there is a new version of the patch.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2023-08-03 21:22:51 Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-03 20:58:46 Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.