Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 08:42, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> On 2020-Nov-03, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 10:57, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2020-Nov-02, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > >
> > > > In v23 I've gone over docs; discovered that PQgetResults docs were
> > > > missing the new values. Added those. No significant other changes
> yet.
> >
> > Thanks for looking at this.
> >
> > What else does it need to get it in shape to apply?
>
> I want to go over the code in depth to grok the design more fully.
>
> It would definitely help if you (and others) could think about the API
> being added: Does it fulfill the promises being made? Does it offer the
> guarantees that real-world apps want to have? I'm not much of an
> application writer myself -- particularly high-traffic apps that would
> want to use this. As a driver author I would welcome your insight in
> these questions.
>
>
I'm sort of in the same boat as you. While I'm closer to the client. I
don't personally write that much client code.

I'd really like to hear from the users here.

Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks